Deuteronomy
asks the same question. There is a promise that God will raise up a prophet
like Moses (18:15). In the Acts of the Apostles, that gets applied to Jesus (3:22;
7:37). But Deuteronomy seems to be speaking about prophets more generally, and
gives two criteria for recognizing them. If prophets speak in the name of
another God, they are false (18:20). And if prophets predict something that
does not come true, then, too, they are false (18:22).
But
that second is not always a good standard. Jonah is commissioned by God and
(eventually!!) says what he was supposed to say: “Forty days more, and Nineveh
shall be overthrown” (3:4). But the people of Nineveh repented, “God changed
his mind” (3:9—itself an interesting thing to think about!), and the prediction
did not come true. Still, Jonah was a prophet. Apparently the criteria are more
fluid than it initially seems.
Still
I think they can be translated into language that makes them applicable today.
We should only follow those who speak in the name of God. God can do and say
surprising things, but on balance this seems to me to look backwards. The
standard we have for judging whether someone speaks in the name of God is Scripture
and tradition. Religious leaders seeking our attention should be recognizably
in conversation Christians of the past.
Predicting
the future is a more difficult criterion, if only because we cannot know until
after the fact if the prediction comes true. But we can think of this as the forward
looking criterion. Religious leaders today need to offer a compelling vision of
the future if they claim to speak in the name of God.
That
is all still pretty nebulous. I guess God gives us enough freedom that we have
to take the responsibility of judging for ourselves even when it is hard. But Deuteronomy
18 can help. . . .
Fr. Harvey
No comments:
Post a Comment