That
helped a little bit with the reading for today from Chronicles, which was pretty
dull. King David is planning all the roles for the temple that his son will
build. Most of the reading was lists of names. So, for example, David appointed
families of musicians and assigned them particular duties by lot (chpt 25). In
theory, those families would remain in charge of music at the temple down
through the generations. The same went for the gatekeepers and other roles (chpt
26), and military divisions (chpt 27).
That
makes for a very different way to think about vocation than we were doing in my
family last night. Children are born to a vocation. If my father was a
musician, I would be a musician. (A frightening thought for anyone who knows my
musical limits!)
Being
born to a vocation would be hard in the sense that a young person might not
find that particular work satisfying. On the other hand, it would eliminate the
uncertainty that I still remember feeling when I was in my early twenties, that
sense that I could do whatever I wanted but I had no idea what I wanted.
On
balance, I much prefer the opportunity to discern my own vocation. After five
generations of lawyers, I became a priest, so I have to like that freedom!
But I do like one
thing about the idea of being born into a vocation. People born to a particular
vocation know that they do not choose
their vocation. They simply live into it. Sometimes in our culture we celebrate
individual choice so much that we lose sight of the idea of calling as
something that comes to us from outside, something to which we respond well or
poorly, something that is given to us rather than something we make for ourselves.
I want my son (both of them!) to discover his vocation, which requires patient
listening and not just self-exploration. I am not sure how well he understands
that. I cannot blame him because I am still working on it myself!Fr. Harvey
No comments:
Post a Comment